Risk Managing Complex Projects through Alliancing
Keywords:
project management, complex projects, alliancesAbstract
Complex projects are characterised by not only known risks that present challenges in integrating technical and human related interface issues but also by uncertainty about unknown unknowns and ambiguity about that which is assumed to be known but is indeed a potential source of confusion.
How best to establish a project delivery approach for these types of projects? We know from government reports, audit office reports, academic research and often personal experience that typically such complex projects are delivered late and well over budget? Surely, there must be a better way to deliver complex projects.
One project delivery approach that has generally offered a great deal of promise to managing risk, uncertainty and ambiguity is through the use of alliancing. This paper draws upon evidence from government reports, academic studies and a wide body of risk management and project delivery theory to illuminate this issue and to suggest a way forward.
Several key points are drawn in this paper:
- Alliancing is not a panacea for managing any complex projects there are some important pre-conditions that need to be met and these are discussed further in the paper;
- Where alliancing has been used in both Australia and New Zealand it has been successful in delivering in terms of time/cost/quality as well as in delivering many intangible benefits, these delivery benefits are also briefly discussed;
- Alliancing requires additional skill sets, knowledge, personal attributes and experience of participants and this is perhaps the most important issue facing the future of alliancing and similar project delivery firms that are evolving from alliancing; and
- Australia and New Zealand lead the world in this form of project delivery.
A short section concludes the paper.
References
Brady, T., Davies, A., Gann, D. and Rush, H. (2007). “Learning to manage mega projects: the case of BAA and Heathrow Terminal 5.” Project Management Perspectives. XXIX: 33-39.
Cohen, J. (2010) Integrated Project Delivery: Case Studies, Sacramento, CA, American Institute of Architects (AIA) - AIA California Council.
Department of Finance and Treasury Victoria (2010). The Practitioners’ Guide to Alliance Contracting, Melbourne, Department of Treasury and Finance, Victoria: 161.
Doherty, S. (2008) Heathrow's T5 History in the Making, Chichester, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Duffield, S. and Whitty, S. J. (2015). “Developing a systemic lessons learned knowledge model for organisational learning through projects.” International Journal of Project Management. (0).
Flyvbjerg, B., Holm, M. S. and Buhl, S. (2002). “Underestimating Costs in Public Works Projects: Error or Lie?” Journal of the American Planning Association. 68 (3): 279.
Flyvbjerg, B., Rothengatter, W. and Bruzelius, N. (2003) Megaprojects and risk : an anatomy of ambition, New York, Cambridge University Press.
Kurtz, C. F. and Snowden, D. J. (2003). “The new dynamics of strategy: sense-making in a complex and complicated world.” IBM Systems Journal. 42 (3): 462(22).
Laan, A., Voordijk, H. and Dewulf, G. (2011). “Reducing opportunistic behaviour through a project alliance.” International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. 4 (4): 660 - 679.
Lahdenperä, P. (2012). “Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery.” Construction Management and Economics. 30 (1): 57-79.
Merrow, E. W. (2012). “Oil and Gas Industry Megaprojects: Our Recent Track Record.”
Parker, S. K., Atkins, P. and Axtell, C. (2008). Building better work places through individual perspective taking: A fresh look at a fundamental human process. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Hodgkinson G. P. and J. K. Ford. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons Inc. . 23: 149-196.
Raisbeck, P., Duffield, C. and Xu, M. (2010). “Comparative performance of PPPs and traditional procurement in Australia.” Construction Management and Economics. 28 (4): 345-359.
Snowden, D. J. and Boone, M. E. (2007). “A Leader's Framework for Decision Making.” Harvard Business Review. 85 (11): 69-76.
Walker, D. H. T., Harley, J. and Mills, A. (2013). Longitudinal Study of Performance in Large Australasian Public Sector Infrastructure Alliances 2008-2013, Melbourne, RMIT University, Centre for Integrated Project Solutions: 48pp.
Walker, D. H. T. and Lloyd-Walker, B. M. (2014). “The ambience of a project alliance in Australia.” Engineering Project Organization Journal. 4 (1): 2-16.
Walker, D. H. T. and Lloyd-Walker, B. M. (2015) Collaborative Project Procurement Arrangements, Newtown Square, PA, Project Management Institute.
Wood, P. and Duffield, C. (2009). In Pursuit of Additional Value A benchmarking study into alliancing in the Australian Public Sector, Melbourne, Department of Treasury and Finance, Victoria: 191.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Derek Walker
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.