Risk Management in Project Environments: Reflection of The Standard Process

Authors

  • Brian Joseph Galli Brian Joseph Galli Long Island University - Post United States

Keywords:

Project Management, Risk Management, Risk Analysis, Project Risk

Abstract

This research analyzes the concept of risk management in project environments by reflecting on the best practices that make up the standard risk management process in project environments. A meta-analysis approach was used to evaluate standard tools and approaches to risk management in project management environments. The study found that regardless of the project complexity or type of risk, there is a standard risk management process that should be followed when examining risk in project environments. In any project scenario, risk management has risk probability and impact assessment to investigate the likelihood that each risk occurs. It also focuses on the potential effects that a risk will have on a project’s objectives, including schedule, cost, quality, and performance. The study concludes that all project managers and organizational leaderships should know the standard risk management process in project management; it is only with a standard process that risks can be effectively identified, assessed, and mitigated.

Author Biography

  • Brian Joseph Galli, Brian Joseph Galli Long Island University - Post United States

    Assistant Professor School of Computer Science, Innovation, and Management Engineering Long Island University – Post

References

Achanga, P., Shehab, E., Roy, R., & Nelder, G. (2006). Critical success factors for lean implementation within SMEs. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17(4), 460–471.

Ahmed, N., Sawhney, R., & Xueping, L. (2007). A model to manage emergent manufacturing. IIE Annual Conference and Expo 2007 - Industrial Engineering’s Critical Role in a Flat World, May 19, 2007 - May23, 2007, 31–36.

Amato, Paul R. and Bruce Keith.1991. Parental Divorce and Adult Well-Being: A Meta-Analysis, Journal of Marriage and Family 53(1): 43-58.

Begg, Colin B. and Madhuchhanda Mazumdar. 1994. Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias, Biometrics 50(4): 1088-1101.

Boehm, B. & Turner, R. (2003). Using risk to balance agile and plan-driven methods. Computer, 36(6), 57 – 66. doi:10.1109/MC.2003.1204376.

Boyer, M. & Sovilla, L. (2003). How to identify and remove the barriers for a successful lean implementation. Journal of Ship Production, 19(2), 116–120.

Burnes, B. (2005). Complexity theories and organizational change. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(2), 73–90.

Card, David and Alan B. Kruger. 1995. Time-Series Minimum-Wage Studies: A Meta-analysis, The American Economic Review 85(2): 238-243, Papers and Proceedings of the Hundredth and Seventh Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association.

Doyle, J. & Thomason, R.H. (1999). Background to Qualitative Decision Theory. AI Magazine, 20(2), 55.

Emiliani, M.L. (2006). Origins of lean management in America: The role of Connecticut businesses. Journal of Management History, 12, 167–184.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2006, August). From Nobel Prize to Project Management: Getting Risks Right. Project Management Journal.

Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., & Rothengatter, W. (2003). Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition. Cambridge University Press.

Glover, W.J., Farris, J.A., Van Aken, E.M., & Doolen, T.L. (2011). Critical success factors for the sustainability of Kaizen event human resource outcomes: An empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 132, 197–213.

Goldratt, E.M., & Cox, J. (2004). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement (3rd Revised). North River Pr. Goodyer, J., Murrti, Y., Grigg, N. P., & Shekar, A. (2011).

Hedges, Larry V. and Ingram Olkin. 1985. Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Orlando: Academic Press.

Kothari, C. R. (2009). Research Methodology Methods and Techniques, 2nd Revised Edition. New Age International publishers. ISBN (13): 978-81-224-2488-1.

Nashville, TN, United states: Institute of Industrial Engineers. AS/NZS ISO 31000. (2009). AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009 - Risk management — Principles and guidelines on implementation (Joint Australia New Zealand International Standard). Standards New Zealand.

Pons, D. (2009). Working Document: Qualitative risk map: Suggested approach. University of Canterbury. PRAM. (1997). PRAM: Project Risk Analysis and Management Guide. APM Group Limited.

Purdy, G. (2010). ISO 31000:2009—Setting a New Standard for Risk Management. Risk Analysis, 30(6), 881–886. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01442.x

Rosenthal, Robert. 1979. The “File Drawer Problem” and Tolerance for Null Results, Psychological Bulletin 86(3): 638-641.

Stanley, T.D. 2001. Wheat from Chaff: Meta-Analysis as Quantitative Literature Review, The Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(3): 131-150.

Stuck, Andreas E., Jutta M. Walthert, Thorsten Nikolaus, Christophe J. Büla, Christoph Hohmann, and John C. Beck.1999. Risk factors for functional status decline in community-living elderly people: a systematic literature review, Social Science & Medicine 48: 445-469.

Vemer, Elizabeth, Marilyn Colema, Lowrence H. Ganog, and Harris Cooper. 1989. Marital Satisfaction in Remarriage: A Meta-Analysis, Journal of Marriage and Family 51(3): 713-725.

Waldorf, Brigitte and Pillsung Byun. 2005. Meta-analysis of the impact of age structure on fertility, Journal of Population Economics 18: 15-40.

Weichselbaumer, Doris and Rudolf Winter-Ebmer. 2005. A Meta-Analysis of the International Gender Gap, Journal of Economics Survey 19(3): 479-511.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-20

How to Cite

Risk Management in Project Environments: Reflection of The Standard Process. (2022). The Journal of Modern Project Management, 5(2). https://journalmodernpm.com/manuscript/index.php/jmpm/article/view/JMPM01405

Similar Articles

1-10 of 473

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.