The hot potato game: roles and responsibilities for realizing IT project benefits

Authors

  • Alejandro Romero Torres Alejandro Romero Torres École de Sciences de la Gestion ESG Université du Québec à Montréal UQAM Chaire de gestion de projets ESG UQAM Canada
  • Nassim Khemici Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM). Canada
  • Magali Paré School of Management (ESG) from Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM). Canada

Keywords:

benefits realization management, information technology, project management, program management, portfolio management

Abstract

A number of frameworks have been proposed to help organizations manage their IT projects and get the willing benefits, such as Project Management Book of Knowledge, Managing successful programmes, Program management and Managing Benefits from APMG certificate. Even though most of them are prescriptive, evidence has shown that organizations front strong difficulties to adopt them. Hence, this paper present the benefit realization methodology implemented by a public organization to appropriately manage IT/IS project benefits. Based on two case studies from the same organization, we described how the organization have identified desired benefits, defined project outcomes, planned benefit realization, realized benefits and assessed the benefit accomplishment. We have also described which stakeholders should participate in the benefits realization methodology and described their main responsibilities: portfolio management level, program and project level, project sponsor, lead users and change management officers.

Author Biographies

  • Alejandro Romero Torres, Alejandro Romero Torres École de Sciences de la Gestion ESG Université du Québec à Montréal UQAM Chaire de gestion de projets ESG UQAM Canada

    Alejandro Romero is a professor at School of Management (ESG) from Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM) and associate researcher at the research chair on project management and at research chair on management of aeronautical projects. He holds Information Technology Engineering Degree (Universidad Anahuac, Mexico), M. Sc. and Ph.D. in Technology Management (Ecole Polytechnique de Montréal, Canada). In the past 10 years, he has participated as a consultant in several technology implementation projects for different industries (healthcare, government, energy, pharmaceutical, manufacturing, retail, etc.) in Latin America (Mexico, Colombia and Venezuela) and in North America. His research interests are: adoption and diffusion of technology innovation, technology management, organizational transformation and healthcare quality. He has published several articles within technology and project management field.

  • Nassim Khemici, Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM). Canada

    Vice-président aux affaires académiques de deuxième cycle Association étudiante des programmes en technologies de l'information Khemici is a master student in technology information at School of Management (ESG) from Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM).

  • Magali Paré, School of Management (ESG) from Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM). Canada

    Magali Paré is a master student in project management at School of Management (ESG) from Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM).

References

Al-Ahmad, W., Al-Fagih, K., Khanfar, K., Alsamara, K., Abuleil, S., &

Abu-Salem, H. (2009). A taxonomy of an IT project failure: root causes. International Management Review, 5(1), 93-104.

Ashurst, C., Doherty, N. F., & Peppard, J. (2008). Improving the impact of IT development projects: the benefits realization capability model. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(4), 352-370.

Ashurst, C., & Hodges, J. (2010). Exploring business transformation: The challenges of developing a benefits realization capability. Journal of Change Management, 10(2), 217-237.

Dos Santos, B., & Sussman, L. (2000). Improving the return on IT investment: the productivity paradox. International journal of information management, 20(6), 429-440.

Badewi, A. (2015). Project Management, Benefits Management and Program Management. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Salford).

Bannerman, P. L. (2008). Risk and risk management in software projects: A reassessment. Journal of Systems and Software, 81(12), 2118-2133.

Bradley, G. (2016). Benefit Realisation Management: A practical guide to achieving benefits through change. CRC Press.

Bryde, D., Broquetas, M., & Volm, J. M. (2013). The project benefits of building information modelling (BIM). International journal of project management, 31(7), 971-980.

Coombs, C. R. (2015). When planned IS/IT project benefits are not realized: a study of inhibitors and facilitators to benefits realization. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 363-379.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A.(2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Organizational Research Methods, 12(3), 614-617.

Doherty, N. F., Ashurst, C., & Peppard, J. (2012). Factors affecting the successful realisation of benefits from systems development projects: findings from three case studies. Journal of Information Technology, 27(1), 1-16.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative inquiry, 12(2), 219-245.

Fortune, J., Peters, G., & Short, L. (2015). Shared understanding during design and delivery: the case of a large-scale information systems program. International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, 7(4), 327-338.

Gunasekaran, A., Love, P. E., Rahimi, F., & Miele, R. (2001). A model for investment justification in information technology projects. International Journal of Information Management, 21(5), 349-364.

Jenner, S. (2014). Managing benefits, Second edition, The Stationery Office. London.

Hellang, Ø., Skiftenes Flak, L., & Päivärinta, T. (2013). Diverging approaches to benefits realization from public ICT investments: A study of benefits realization methods in Norway. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 7(1), 93-108.

Levinson, M. (2009). Recession causes rising IT project failure rates. CIO Magazine, 18(June).

Lin, C., Pervan, G., & McDermid, D. (2007). Issues and recommendations in evaluating and managing the benefits of public sector IS/IT outsourcing. Information Technology & People, 20(2), 161-183.

Love, P. E., Matthews, J., Simpson, I., Hill, A., & Olatunji, O. A. (2014). A benefits realization management building information modeling framework for asset owners. Automation in construction, 37, 1-10.

Marnewick, C. (2016). Benefits of information system projects: The tale of two countries. International Journal of Project Management, 34(4), 748-760.

Nogeste, K., & Walker, D. H. (2005). Project outcomes and outputs: making the intangible tangible. Measuring Business Excellence, 9(4), 55-68.

Nogeste, K., & Walker, D. H. (2008). Development of a method to improve the definition and alignment of intangible project outcomes and tangible project outputs. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 1(2), 279-287.

Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of management information systems, 24(3), 45-77.

Peppard, J. (2010). Unlocking the performance of the chief information officer (CIO). California Management Review, 52(4), 73-99.

Peppard, J., & Ward, J. (2004). Beyond strategic information systems: towards an IS capability. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 13(2), 167-194.

Peppard, J., Ward, J., & Daniel, E. (2007). Managing the realization of business benefits from IT investments. MIS Quarterly Executive, 6(1), 1-11.

Project Management Institute PMI. (2013). Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK). Project Management Institute.

Office of Government Commerce OGC. (2011). Managing successful programmes. The Stationery Office.

Remenyi, D., Sherwood-Smith, M. And White, T. (1997): Achieving Maximum Value from Information Systems: A Process Approach, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England

Sapountzis, S. (2013). An investigation into the development of an effective benefits realisation process for healthcare infrastructure projects (Doctoral dissertation, Kent Business School).

Serafeimidis, V., & Smithson, S. (2003). Information systems evaluation as an organizational institution–experience from a case study. Information Systems Journal, 13(3), 251-274.

Stake, R. E. (2013). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press.

Standing, C., & Lin, C. (2007). Organizational evaluation of the benefits, constraints, and satisfaction of business-to-business electronic commerce. International Journal of electronic commerce, 11(3), 107-134.

Thorp, J. (2003). The information paradox: realizing the business benefits of information technology. McGraw-Hill Ryerson.

Viklund, K., & Tjernström, V. (2008). Benefits Management and its applicability in practice (Master's thesis).

Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage publications.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-20

How to Cite

The hot potato game: roles and responsibilities for realizing IT project benefits. (2022). The Journal of Modern Project Management, 5(2). https://journalmodernpm.com/manuscript/index.php/jmpm/article/view/JMPM01408

Similar Articles

1-10 of 476

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.