Improving Risk Matrix Design Using Heatmaps and Accessible Colors
Keywords:
Project Risk Management, Risk Matrix, Quantitative Risk Analysis, Heatmap, Color Vision Deficiency, accessible colorsAbstract
Risk management is an integrated part of project management to identify, assess, evaluate and mitigate threats or opportunities that aid or endanger the goals of a project. Risk Matrices are one of the most popular tools to execute a proper risk management process. However, they suffer from shortcomings that can lead to non-meaningful results and oversimplified classification. Cox (2008a) and other researchers have described these shortcomings, Thomas et al.(2013) even proposed to avoid risk matrices in general. This paper presents adaptions that will prevent oversimplified classification, e.g. continuous coloring schemes and viewing risk probability and risk consequence as independent variables. Furthermore, the typical green-yellow-red color scheme is questioned due to its lack of perceptual uniformity and inaccessibility for people with color vision deficiencies. It is proposed that these changes will shaft the area of application from standalone risk analysis tools to supporting tools for quantitative risk analysis which will develop to be the state of the art in project risk management.
References
Ball, D. J., & Watt, J. (2013). Further Thoughts on the Utility of Risk Matrices. Risk Analysis, 33(11), 2068–2078.
Borland, D., & Taylor, R. M. (2007). Rainbow Color Map (Still) Considered Harmful. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 27(April), 14–17.
Cox, L. A. (2008a). What’s wrong with risk matrices? Risk Analysis, 28(2), 497–512.
Cox, L. A. (2008b). Some limitations of “risk = threat x vulnerability x consequence” for risk analysis of terrorist attacks. Risk Analysis, 28(6), 1749–1761.
Cox, L. A. (2009). Improving risk-based decision making for terrorism applications. Risk Analysis, 29(3), 321–335.
Cox, L. A., Babayev, D., & Huber, W. (2005). Some limitations of qualitative risk rating systems. Risk Analysis, 25(3), 651–662.
Duijm, N. J. (2015). Recommendations on the use and design of risk matrices. Safety Science, 76, 21–31.
Elmontsri, M. (2014). Review of the strengths and weaknesses of risk matrices. Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response, 4(1), 49–57.
Gardoni, P., & Murphy, C. (2014). A Scale of Risk. Risk Analysis, 34(7), 1208–1227.
Hubbard, D., & Evans, D. (2010). Problems with scoring methods and ordinal scales in risk assessment. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 54(3), 2:1-2:10.
Hubbard, D. W., & Seiersen, R. (2016). How to Measure Anything in Cybersecurity Risk. Wiley, 304p.
Huber, B., & Cox, T. (2008). Optimal Design of Qualitative Risk Matrices to Classify Quantitative Risks. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Society of Risk Analysis; Boston, Massachusetts.
Levine, E. S. (2012). Improving risk matrices: the advantages of logarithmically scaled axes. Journal of Risk Research, 15(2), 209–222.
Li, J., Bao, C., & Wu, D. (2018). How to Design Rating Schemes of Risk Matrices: A Sequential Updating Approach. Risk Analysis.
Montibeller, G., & von Winterfeldt, D. (2015). Cognitive and Motivational Biases in Decision and Risk Analysis. Risk Analysis, 35(7), 1230–1251.
Ni, H., Chen, A., & Chen, N. (2010). Some extensions on risk matrix approach. Safety Science, 48(10), 1269–1278.
Oliveira, M. D., Bana e Costa, C. A., & Lopes, D. F. (2015). Designing and exploring risk matrices with MACBETH. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 14, 1–37.
Olson, D. L., & Wu, D. D. (2017). Enterprise Risk Management Models. Springer Texts in Business and Economics Enterprise, 216p.
Rogowitz, B. E., Treinish, L. A. (1998). Data visualization: The end of the rainbow. IEEE Spectrum, 35(12), 52-59.
Sander, P., Moergeli, A., Reilly, J. (2015). Quantitative Risk Analysis – Fallacy of the Single Number. Proceedings of the World Tunnel Congress, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
Thomas, P., Bratvold, R. B., & Bickel, E. (2013). The Risk of Using Risk Matrices. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 56–66.
Van der Walt, S., & Smith, N. (2015). Mpl Colormaps. SciPy, July 6 – 12, Austin, Texas.
Weber, M. (2006). Some Safety Aspects on the Design of Sparger Systems for the. Process Safety Progress, 25(4), 326–330.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Martin Entacher, Philip Sander

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.