Project Governance, An essay on the business policy approach as applied to the governance of megaprojects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19255/JMPM02406Keywords:
business policy, corporate governance, megaprojects, steering committee, project managementAbstract
The literature addressing the subject of projects and megaprojects governance is somewhat incipient and ambiguous. This work aims at a discussion of the possible contribution of the business policy approach as a means to overcome this gap in the practical governance of megaprojects. The category of megaprojects was chosen because they are organizations with some resemblance to companies in the wider sense of the word, despite some fundamental differences. Within the scope of megaprojects, we find a governance architecture that parallels the double tier of traditional corporate governance models. Project directors usually have a team similar to that of traditional companies. This can be envisioned as the executive board or managing structure of a traditional company. But these sorts of projects generally have a project steering committee, which is a non-executive governing structure addressing the scope of the project and which broadly considered might be compared with the non-executive board (or supervisory council) from traditional organizations. We propose for discussion an example of double tier project governance, approached from a business policy viewpoint, distinguishing executive from non-executive roles. The text ends by addressing the institutional configuration area of business policy in the context of megaprojects, as well as a reflexion on the validity of the points of view proposed.
References
Ahola, T., Ruuska, I., Artto, K., & Kujala, J. (2014). What is project governance and what are its origins? International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1321-1332.
Andrews, K. R. (1981). Corporate-strategy as a vital function of the board. Harvard Business Review, 59(6), 174-184.
Andrews, K. R., & David, D. K. (1971). The concept of corporate strategy. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
Bekker, M. C. (2014). Project Governance: Schools of Thought. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 17, 22-32.
Bekker, M. C., & Steyn, H. (2009). Defining “project governance” for large capital projects. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 20(2), 81-92.
Bender, J. (2015). Pentagon: Here are all the problems with the F-35. Business Insider. Retrieved January 11th, 2019, from: https://www.businessinsider.com/here-are-all-the-problems-with-the-f-35-that-the-pentagon-found-in-a-2014-report-2015-3
Bevir, M. (2012). Governance: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
Calleja, R., & Melé, D. (2017). Valero’s “Enterprise Politics”: A model of humanistic management and corporate governance. Journal of Management Development, 36(5), 644-659.
Christensen, C. R., Andrews, K. R., Bower, J. L., Hamermesh, R. G., & Porter, M. E. (1973). Business policy: Text and cases. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386-405.
Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20-47.
Esty, B. C. (2004). Why Study Large Projects? An Introduction to Research on Project Finance. European Financial Management, 10(2), 213-224.
Esty, B. C., & Bitsch, F. (2013). The Kashagan Production Sharing Agreement (PSA). Harvard Business School, Case 9-213-082.
Esty, B. C., Chavich, C., & Sesia, A. (2014). An Overview of Project Finance and Infrastructure Finance — 2014 Update. Harvard Business School, Background Note 214-083.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Agency problems and residual claims. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 327-349.
Finnerty, J. D. (1996). Project Financing: Asset-Based Financial Engineering. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Project Management Journal, 45(2), 6-19.
Forrester, J. W. (1968). Principles of Systems. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press.
Geraldi, J., & Morris, P. W. G. (2011). Managing the institutional context for projects. Project Management Journal, 42(6), 20-32.
Holland, J. H. (1995). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. Redwood City, CA: Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
John, T. A., & John, K. (1991). Optimality of project financing: Theory and empirical implications in finance and accounting. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 1(1), 51-74.
Joslin, R., & Müller, R. (2016). The relationship between project governance and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 34(4), 613-626.
Mcgrath, S. K., & Whitty, S. J. (2013). Do steering committees and boards constitute good project governance? In Proceedings of the Annual Project Management Australia Conference Incorporating the PMI Australia National Conference (PMOz). Melbourne, Australia.
Mir, F. A., & Pinnington, A. H. (2014). Exploring the value of project management: Linking Project Management Performance and Project Success. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 202-217.
PMBOK (2013). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide). Newtown Square, Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute, Inc.
Porter, M. E. (1991). Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 95-117.
Pye, A. (2002). Corporate directing: Governing, strategising and leading in action. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 10(3), 153-162.
Sainati, T., Brookes, N., & Locatelli, G. (2017). Special Purpose Entities in megaprojects: Empty boxes or real companies? Project Management Journal, 48(2), 55-73.
Sanderson, J. (2012). Risk, uncertainty and governance in megaprojects: A critical discussion of alternative explanations. International Journal of Project Management, 30(4), 432-443.
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and science of the learning organization. New York: Currency Doubleday.
Sirisomboonsuk, P., Gu, V. C., Cao, R. Q., & Burns, J. R. (2018). Relationships between project governance and information technology governance and their impact on project performance. International Journal of Project Management, 36, 287-300.
Valero, A. (1962). Estructura de la Empresa. Nuestro Tiempo, 93.
Valero, A. (2001). In memoriam de Antonio Valero y Vicente (1925-2001). Con motivo de la entrega de la Medalla de Oro de la Universidad de Navarra a título póstumo. Barcelona: IESE - Universidad de Navarra.
Valero, A., & Figueroa, E. T. (2011). La empresa de negócios y la alta dirección: Procedimientos politicos de gobierno (3a Ed.). Pamplona: Eunsa.
Valero, A., & Lucas, J. L. (1991). Política de Empresa: El Gobierno de la Empresa de Negocios. Pamplona: Eunsa.
Williamson, O. E. (1981). The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548-577.
Zhai, Z., Ahola, T., Le, Y., & Xie, J. (2017). Governmental governance of megaprojects: The case of EXPO 2010 Shanghai. Project Management Journal, 48(1), 37-50.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Pedro B Água, Andre Vilares Morgado
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.