A Method to Create Hybrid Models Using a Morphological Matrix
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19255/JMPM02604Keywords:
Hybrid Models, Project Management, Agile Project Management, Model Customization, Morphological MatrixAbstract
Prescriptive management models are falling short to deal with the current and increasingly uncertain and dynamic business environment. The search for so-called hybrid models has increased among different organizations and industrial sectors. Despite the interest, there is a lack of systematic procedures to effectively adapt hybrid models to specific projects. In order to bridge this gap, we propose a method to support the creation of hybrid models, based on a morphological matrix that allows the combination of practices to the specific needs of each project. The method was developed through a systematic literature review, a theoretical proposition phase and its evaluation in a single case study involving an information technology company. The results indicate that a customization by project is feasible, allowing professionals to be more assertive in creating customized management solutions. Finally, the study highlights the possibility of creating systematic procedures to assist organizations and professionals in choosing management practices for their projects and the consequent creation of hybrid models.
References
Adelakun, O., Garcia, R., Tabaka, T., & Garcia, R. (2017). Hybrid Project Management : Agile with Discipline. In: International Conference on Information Resources Management (CONF-IRM). Association For Information Systems.
Ambler, S., & Lines, M. (2018). Choose Your WoW ! A Disciplined Agile Delivery Handbook for Optimizing Your Way of Working (Disciplined Agile Consortium, Ed.). Disciplined Agile, Inc.
Augustine, S. (2005). Managing Agile Projects. Prentice Hall PTR.
Azenha, F. C., Reis, D. A., & Fleury, A. L. (2020). The Role and Characteristics of Hybrid Approaches to Project Management in the Development of Technology-Based Products and Services. Project Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972820956884
Bäcklander, G. (2019). Doing complexity leadership theory: How agile coaches at Spotify practise enabling leadership. Creativity and Innovation Management, 28(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12303
Barlow, J. B., Giboney, J. S., Keith, M. J., Wilson, D. W., Schuetzler, R. M., Lowry, P. B., & Vance, A. (2011). Overview and Guidance on Agile Development in Large Organizations. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 29(July 2011), 25–44.
Batra, D., Xia, W., van der Meer, D., & Dutta, K. (2010). Balancing agile and structured development approaches to successfully manage large distributed software projects: A case study from the cruise line industry. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 27(1), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1.1.186.7346
Bianchi, M. J., Conforto, E. C., & Amaral, D. C. (2021). Beyond the agile methods : a diagnostic tool to support the development of hybrid models. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-04-2020-0119
Bianchi, M., Marzi, G., & Guerini, M. (2020). Agile , Stage-Gate and their combination : Exploring how they relate to performance in software development. Journal of Business Research, 110(May 2017), 538–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.003
Binder, J., Aillaud, L. I., & Schilli, L. (2014). The Project Management Cocktail Model: An Approach for Balancing Agile and ISO 21500. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119(119), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.022
Boehm, B., & Turner, R. (2003). Using risk to balance agile and plan-driven methods. Computer, 36(6), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2003.1204376
Chandrababu, A. (2020). Adoption of Hybrid Methodology in projects.
Ciric, D., Lalic, B., Gracanin, D., Palcic, I., & Zivlak, N. (2018). Agile Project Management in New Product Development and Innovation Processes : Challenges and Benefits Beyond Software Domain. In: 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (TEMS-ISIE)., 1–9.
Conforto, E. C., & Amaral, D. C. (2016). Agile project management and stage-gate model—A hybrid framework for technology-based companies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 40, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2016.02.003
Conforto, Edivandro Carlos. (2013). Modelo e ferramenta para avaliação da agilidade no gerenciamento de projetos. In Tese (Doutorado) - Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo.
Conforto, Edivandro Carlos, Rebentisch, E., & Amaral, D. C. (2014). The Building Blocks of Agility as a Team ’ s Competence. Project Management Agility Global Survey.
Cooper, R. G. (2014). What’s Next?: After Stage-Gate. Research-Technology Management, 57(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5606963
Cooper, R. G. (2016). Agile-Stage-Gate Hybrids. Research Technology Management, 59(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2016.1117317
Cooper, R. G. (2017). Idea-to-Launch Gating Systems : Better , Faster , and More Agile Idea-to-Launch Gating Systems. Research-Technology Management, 60(1), 48–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2017.1255057
Cooper, R. G., & Sommer, A. F. (2016). The Agile–Stage-Gate Hybrid Model: A Promising New Approach and a New Research Opportunity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 00(00), n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12314
Duhovnik, J., & Tavčar, J. (2005). Product design test using the matrix of functions and functionality. DS 40: Proceedings of AEDS 2005 Workshop, (November).
Eder, S., Conforto, E., Amaral, D., & Silva, S. da. (2015). Diferenciando as abordagens tradicional e ágil de gerenciamento de projetos. Production Journal, 25(3), 482–497. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-65132014005000021
Fargnoli, M., Rovida, E., & Troisi, R. (2006). The morphological matrix: Tool for the development of innovative design solutions. Proc. ICAD, 1–7. Retrieved from http://www.axiod.com/technology/icad/icad2006/icad2006_21.pdf
Fitzgerald, B., Stol, K., Sullivan, R. O., & Brien, D. O. (2013). Scaling Agile Methods to Regulated Environments : An Industry Case Study. In: 2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). IEEE.
Galal-Edeen, G. H., Riad, a. M., & Seyam, M. S. (2007). Agility versus discipline: Is reconciliation possible? ICCES’07 - 2007 International Conference on Computer Engineering and Systems, 331–337. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCES.2007.4447068
Gemino, A., Horner Reich, B., & Serrador, P. M. (2020). Agile, Traditional, and Hybrid Approaches to Project Success: Is Hybrid a Poor Second Choice? Project Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972820973082
Highsmith, J. (2004). Agile Project Management: Creating Innovative Products. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Imani, T., Nakano, M., & Anantatmula, V. (2017). Does a Hybrid Approach of Agile and Plan-Driven Methods Work Better for IT System Development Projects ? Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Application, 7(3), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.9790/9622-
Kennedy, D., & Philbin, S. (2014). Diagnostic Framework and Health Check Tool for Engineering and Technology Projects Simon. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management.
Leffingwell, D. (2010). Agile software requirements : lean requirements practices for teams, programs, and the enterprise. Addison-Wesley Professional.
Magistretti, S., Trabucchi, D., Era, C. D., & Buganza, T. (2019). A New Path Toward a Hybrid Model: Insights from PwC’s Italian Experience Centre. Research-Technology Management, 62(5), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2019.1638223
Mcgrath, J., & Kostalova, J. (2020). Project Management Trends and New Challenges. https://doi.org/10.36689/uhk/hed/2020-01-061
Mcmillan, E. (2004). Complexity, organizations and change. London: Routledge.
Nawrocki, J., Olek, L., Jasinski, M., Paliświat, B., Walter, B., Pietrzak, B., & Godek, P. (2006). Balancing agility and discipline with XPrince. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 266–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/11751113_19
Ölvander, J., Lundén, B., & Gavel, H. (2009). A computerized optimization framework for the morphological matrix applied to aircraft conceptual design. CAD Computer Aided Design, 41(3), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2008.06.005
PAHL, G., & BEITZ, W. (2007). Engineering design: A systematic approach (3rd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703993104
Pich, M. T., Loch, C. H., & Meyer, A. De. (2002). On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management. Management Science, 48(8), 1008–1023. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1008.163
PMI. (2017a). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (6th ed.). Newtown Square, Pa: Project Management Institute.
PMI. (2017b). Success Rates Rise: Transforming the high cost of low performance.
PMI’s Pulse of the Profession, (9th Global Project Management Survey), 32. Retrieved from http://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/learning/thought-leadership/pulse/pulse-of-the-profession-2017.pdf
Riesener, M., Dölle, C., Ays, J., & Ays, J. L. (2018). Hybridization of Development Projects Through Process-related Combination of Agile and Plan-driven Approaches. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 602–606. IEEE.
Ritchey, T. (1998). General morphological analysis. 16th Euro Conference on Operational Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19653-9_2
Shenhar, A., & Dvir, D. (2007). Reinventing Project Management: the diamond approach to successful growth and innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2007.12.001
Sommer, A. F., Hedegaard, C., Dukovska-Popovska, I., & Steger-Jensen, K. (2015). Improved Product Development Performance through Agile/Stage-Gate Hybrids. Research Technology Management, 58(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5801236
Špundak, M. (2014). Mixed Agile/Traditional Project Management Methodology – Reality or Illusion? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119(1), 939–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.105
Tan, A. R., & McAloone, T. C. (2006). Characteristics of strategies in product/service-system development. 9th International Design Conference, DESIGN 2006, 1435–1442.
Weber, R. G., & Condoor, S. S. (1998). Conceptual design using a synergistically compatible morphological matrix. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, 1, 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1109/fie.1998.736828
Wysocki, R. ., & Mcgary, R. (2007). Effective Project Management: traditional, adaptative, extreme. Indiana: Wiley Publishing, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Wysocki, R. K. (2007). Effective Software Project Management. In Statistics. Wiley Publishing, Inc.
Zasa, F. P., Patrucco, A., & Pellizzoni, E. (2020). Managing the Hybrid Organization: How Can Agile and Traditional Project Management Coexist? Research Technology Management, 64(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2021.1843331
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Michael Jordan Bianchi, Daniel Capaldo Amaral
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.