Discussions and Lessons Learned from three iterative and longitudinal studies aiming to optimize the identification and analysis process for stakeholders within a project context

Authors

  • Julien Bousquet Université du Québec à Chicoutimi - UQAC Canada
  • Thierno Diallo Université du Québec à Chicoutimi

Keywords:

project relationship, stakeholders management

Abstract

project relationshipProject management research has evolved significantly over the past few decades. Traditionally based on positivism and quantitative approaches, work in the field has gradually expanded to include qualitative interpretative approaches (Biedenbach & Müller, 2011). However, the development of new insights seems to have bypassed several key areas within project management, including stakeholder management. Progress relating to this topic could have a theoretical and pragmatic impact. The work of Achterkamp and Vos (2007) and Jepsen and Eskerod (2009), focusing on stakeholders as a key factor in success, has driven interest in this aspect of project management among academics. The result of this data analysis is that researchers have been able to define several observations and questions with the aim of optimizing the complex process discussed by Bourne and Walker (2006).

Author Biographies

  • Julien Bousquet, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi - UQAC Canada

    Professor of marketing at the University of Québec at Chicoutimi (UQAC) since 2003. He earned a Ph.D. in administration at the University of Quebec at Montréal (UQAM). He is actually director of the project management master’s degree and director of the Multidisciplinary studies in project management (www.uqa.ca/lemgp). His main areas of research focus principally on relationship project (marketing and communication theories applied to project management) and stakeholders management.

  • Thierno Diallo, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi

    Professor of Economics at University of Quebec (UQAC) where he has been since 2005. He received a B.A and M.A. from Toulouse School of Economics (TSE) in France and his Ph.D. in economics from the University of Montreal, Canada in 2006. He worked at National Economics Research Associates (NERA, Inc) in Boston (USA) as a Senior Economist. He is currently a member of Multidisciplinary studies laboratory in project management (http://www.uqac.ca/lemgp) where his research interests center on project stakeholder analysis and project financial and economic analysis and impact assessment.

References

Achterkamp, M. C., & Vos, J. F. J. (2008). Investigating the use of the stakeholder notion in project management literature, a meta-analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 26(7), 749–757.

Biedenbach, T., & Müller, R. (2011). Paradigms in project management research: examples from 15 years of IRNOP conferences. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 4(1), 82-104.

Bourne, L., & Walker, D. H. T. (2006). Visualizing stakeholder influence – Two Australian examples. Project Management Journal, 37(1), 5-21.

Bousquet, J., Diallo, T., & Leyrie, C. (2013). Towards an integrative and longitudinal methodology for analyzing stakeholders within a project context. Journal of Modern Project Management, 01(02), 74-83.

Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 92–11.

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65-91.

El-Gohary, N. M., Osman, H., & El-Diraby, T. E. (2006). Stakeholder management for public private partnerships. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 595–604.

Forgues, B., & Vandangeon-Derumez, I. (2003). Analyses longitudinales. In R. A. Thiétart, Méthodes de recherche en management, Dunod.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. The Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191-205.

Giasson T., Brin, C. & Sauvageau, M. M. (2010). La couverture médiatique des accommodements raisonnables dans la presse écrite québécoise: Vérification de l’hypothèse du tsunami médiatique. Canadian Journal of Communication, 35, 431-453.

Gond, J. P., & Mercier, S. (2005). Les théories des parties prenantes: une synthèse critique de la littérature. Université des sciences sociales Toulouse (Social Sciences University of Toulouse): LIRHE (Interdisciplinary Laboratory for Research on Human Resources and Employment).

Jepsen, A. L., & Eskerod, P. (2009). Stakeholder analysis in projects: Challenges in using current guidelines in the real world. International Journal of Project Management, 27(4), 335-343.

Jones, T. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404-437.

Jones, T. M., & Wicks, A. C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. The Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 206-221.

Karlsen, J. T. (2002). Project stakeholder management. Engineering Management Journal, 14(4), 19-24.

Littau, P., Jujagiri, N. J., & Adlbrecht, G. (2010). 25 Years of stakeholder theory in project management literature (1984–2009). Project Management Journal, 41(4), 17-29.

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.

Newcombe, R. (2003). From client to project stakeholders: A stakeholder mapping approach. Construction Management and Economics, 21(8), 841-848.

Olander, S., & Landin, A. (2008). A comparative study of factors affecting the external stakeholder management process. Construction Management and Economics, 26(6), 553-561.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd edition), Sage Publications, Inc.

Project Management Institute. (2013). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (5th edition). Project Management Institute.

Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887-910.

Yang, J., Shen, G. Q., Ho, M., Drew, D. S., & Xue, X. (2010). Stakeholder management in construction: An empirical study to address research gaps in previous studies. International Journal of Project Management, 29, 900-910.

Yin, R. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods, Sage.

Youker, R. (1992). Managing the international project environment, International Journal of Project Management, 10(4), 219-226.

Young, T. L. (2006). Successful project management (2nd edition), Kogan Page.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-20

How to Cite

Discussions and Lessons Learned from three iterative and longitudinal studies aiming to optimize the identification and analysis process for stakeholders within a project context. (2022). The Journal of Modern Project Management, 3(1), 116. https://journalmodernpm.com/manuscript/index.php/jmpm/article/view/185

Similar Articles

11-20 of 468

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.