Investment Decisions in Modular Product Development
Keywords:
Product development, product architecture, modularity, resource allocation, design rulesAbstract
Developing new products is critical to firms’ success and is the key for sustaining competitive advantage. Firms engaging in product development (PD) face the important problem of allocating scarce development resources to a multitude of opportunities. In this paper, we propose a mathematical formulation to optimize product development (PD) investment decisions. The model maximizes the performance of a product under development based on its product architecture and the firm’s resource constraints. The analysis of the model shows that the architecture of a product plays an essential role in affecting the optimal resource allocation to various product modules.
References
Baldwin, C., Clark, K. (2000). Design Rules: The Power of Modularity. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Cutherell, D. (1996). Product Architecture. The PDMA Handbook of New Product Development, Rosenau M., Griffin A., Castellion G., and Anschuetz N. (eds), John Wiley & sons, 1996.
Eppinger, S. D. and Browning, T. R. (2012). Design Structure Matrix Methods and Applications, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Ethiraj, S.K. and Posen, H.E. (2013). Do product architectures affect innovation productivity in complex product ecosystems. Advances in Strategic Management, 30, 127-166.
Ethiraj, Sendil K. (2007). Allocation of Inventive Effort in Complex Product Systems. Strategic Management Journal, 28(6):563-584.
Fine, C.H. (1998). Clockspeed—Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage. Reading, MA: Perseus.
Fixson, S. K. and Park, J.-K. (2008). The Power of Integrality: Linkages between Product Architecture, Innovation, and Industry Structure. Research Policy, 37(8), 1296-1316
Hölttä, K., Suh, E., de Weck, O. (2005). Tradeoff between Modularity and Performance for Engineered Systems and Product" International Conference on Engineering Design, AUGUST 15 – 18, 2005.
Joglekar, N., Yassine, A., Eppinger, S., Whitney, D., 2001. “Performance of Coupled Product Development Activities with a Deadline", Management Science, 47(12), 2001.
Mihm, J., Lock, C., Huchzermeier, A. (2003). Problem-Solving Oscillations in Complex Engineering Projects. Journal of Management Science, 49 (6), 733-750.
Schilling, M.A., 2000. Towards a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Academy of Management Review 25 (2), 312–334.
Smith, R. P., Eppinger, S.D. (1997). Identifying Controlling Features of Engineering Design Iteration, Manage. Sci., vol. 43, pp. 276-293.
Ulrich, K., (1995). The Role of Product Architecture in the Manufacturing Firm. Journal of Research Policy, 24, 419-440.
Ulrich, K., Eppinger, S.D. (2008). Product Design and Development. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Wasserman, S., Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Whitney D. E. (2004). Physical Limits to Modularity. Working paper, ESD-WP-2003-01.03-ESD, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division.
Yassine A., Joglekar N., Braha, D., Eppinger S., and Whitney D., 2003. “Information Hiding in Product Development: The Design Churn Effect.” Research in Engineering Design. 14 (3), 131-144.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ali A. Yassine

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.