Identifying the Criteria Used for Establishing Work Package Size for Project WBS
Keywords:
WBS, Work Breakdown Structure, work package, criteriaAbstract
A successful completion of a project entails the proper use of project management. Project management includes different areas of which scope, as a major one, requires identification of the work that should be completed in a project. This is greatly facilitated by the use Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), of which Work Packages (WPs) are the basic components. This study aimed at identifying major criteria used by project managers, to establish the work content of the WPs included in the project. The study is based on analysis of 25 projects by their project managers. As part of the analysis, project managers requested to analyze a sample of WPs from each project generating a total of 219 WPs that were analyzed. Five major groups of WPs nature were identified, namely' design, testing, management, production, and procurement. Project managers were asked to identify the rule used by them to stop further decomposition of WPs. Six major rules were identified, which captured 93% of the rules used by project managers in establishing the WP size.
References
A Guide to Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK), (2013), 5th edition, Project Management Association,.
Bachy, G., & Hameri, A-P., (1997), What to be implemented at the early stage of a large-scale project. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 15, no. 4, P. 211-218.
Cooke-Davies T., (2002), The "Real" Success Factors on Projects, International Journal of Project Management, Volume 20, no. 3, P. 185-190
Farzana A., Pinnington A. H., (2014), Exploring the value of project management: Linking Project Management Performance and Project Success, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 32, no. 2, P. 202–217
Jia, P., Gao, Q., Ji, X., & Xu, T., (2014), Task decomposition method of R&D project based on product structure tree. Journal of Software, Vol. 9, no. 7, p. 1894-1902.
Kenley R., Harfield T., (2014), Reviewing the IJPM for WBS: the search for planning and control, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences Vol. 119, P. 887 – 893, 27th IPMA World Congress
Kolltveit, B. J., Karlsen, J. T., & Grønhaug, K., ( 2007), Perspectives on project management, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 25, no. 1, P. 3-9.
Kwak, Y., Ibbs, C., (2000). Calculating project management’s return on investment. Project Management Journal Vol. 31 no. 2, PP 38–47.
Papke-Shields K.E, Beise C., Quan J., (2010), Do project managers practice what they preach, and does it matter to project success?, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 28, no. 7, P. 650–662
Raz T., Globerson S., (1998), Effective Sizing and Content Definition of Work Packages, Project Management Journal, Vol, 29, No. 4, P. 17-23
Serrador, P., & Turner, R., (2015), What is Enough Planning? Results From a Global Quantitative Study, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 62, no. 4, p. 462-474.
Siami-Irdemoosa, E., Dindarloo, S. R., & Sharifzadeh, M., (2015), Work breakdown structure (WBS) development for underground construction. Automation in Construction, Vol. 58, p. 85-94.
Taxén, L., & Lilliesköld, J., (2008), Images as action instruments in complex projects. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 26, no. 5, P. 527- 536.
Thomas J., Mullaly M., (2008), Researching the Value of Project Management, Project Management Institute Publication,
Vanhoucke, M. (2012), Measuring the efficiency of project control using fictitious and empirical project data. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 30, no. 2, P. 252-263.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Shlomo Globerson, Sivan Vardi, Izack Cohen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
