Enhancing Collaboration between Design and Simulation Departments by Methods of Complexity Management

Authors

  • Sebastian Schweigert Technical University of Munich Germany
  • Udo Lindemann Technical University of Munich Germany
  • Mesut Çavuşoğlu Technical University of Munich Germany

Keywords:

CAD-CAE, structural complexity management, DSM, DMM, MDM, system graph, collaboration and collaboration, human behaviour in design

Abstract

The significance of CAD-CAE coupling has grown with the increasing use of simulations in development processes. With the focus on technical aspects like simulation data management in literature, however, there is a lack of research on the implications on collaboration. This paper uses methods of structural complexity management to improve communication and collaboration between simulation and design departments. Design structure matrices and multiple domain matrices are derived from system graphs that come from interviews. A case study uses these methods to handle data to enhance collaboration between departments. The results are techniques to deal with lacking information and low degrees of connectivity in the matrices. After an overlay of different matrices, standard procedures like triangulation and clustering can be applied that would otherwise not have been sensible. This leads to knowledge clusters and sequences of documents and task that help to integrate simulations more smoothly into the product development process.

Author Biographies

  • Sebastian Schweigert, Technical University of Munich Germany

    Sebastian Schweigert is a Research Associate with the Chair of Product Development. Since June 2015 he has been working on his PhD in the field of CAD-CAE integration. Before his PhD, he studied mechanical engineering at the Technical University of Munich for both his bachelor and his master degree. This included an exchange semester at the Nanyang Technological University, Singapore and an internship at Brainlab Inc. as well a master thesis at Siemens.

  • Udo Lindemann, Technical University of Munich Germany

    Prof. Dr.-Ing. Udo Lindemann, Technical University of Munich, Chair of Product Development (lindemann@pe.mw.tum.de) – Mr. Lindemann is of the Chair of Product Development at the Technical University of Munich. Today he is a member of the Academic Senate of the Technical University Munich. He is co-publisher of the German journal "Konstruktion" and co-editor of several international journals. Since the initiation of the Design Society, he has been an active member; from 2007 to 2010, he served as its President. In addition, he is an active member of a number of scientific

  • Mesut Çavuşoğlu, Technical University of Munich Germany

    Mesut Çavuşoğlu (mesut.chavushoglu@tum.de) - Mesut Çavuşoğlu is currently a graduate student at the Technical University of Munich. After finishing his bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering at the Boğaziçi University in Istanbul, he started his master’s degree in mechanical engineering and management in 2015. During his master studies, he tries to excel himself in product development processes. He also wrote a semester thesis at the Institute of Product Development on the same topic.

References

Assouroko, I., Ducellier, G., Belkadim, F., Eynard, B., & Boutinaud, P. (2010). Improvement of engineering design and numerical simulation data exchange based on requirements deployment: a conceptual framework. Proceedings of the 7th International Product Lifecycle Management Conference, Bremen.

Browning, T. R. (2001). Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 48(3), 292-306.

Deubzer, F., Herfeld, U., Kreimeyer, M., & Lindemann, U. (2005). A structured holistic approach for the integration of CAD and CAE environments. Paper presented at the ProSTEP iViP Science Days 2005-Cross Domain Engineering.

Engel, A., Reich, Y., Browning, T.R., Schmidt, D.M., 2012. Optimizing system architecture for adaptability. Proceedings of INTERNATIONAL DESIGN CONFERENCE - DESIGN 2012 May 21 - 24, 2012.

Forsen, J., & Hoffmann, R. (2002). Assoziative FE-Netze in der Karosserieentwicklung. Düsseldorf: VDI-Verlag.

Gujarathi, G., & Ma, Y.-S. (2011). Parametric CAD/CAE integration using a common data model. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 30(3), 118-132.

Hirz, M., Dietrich, W., Gfrerrer, A., & Lang, J. (2013). Integrated computer-aided design in automotive development. Book). http://books. google. com/books.

Kreimeyer, M., Deubzer, F., Herfeld, U., & Lindemann, U. (2005). Holistic Integration of CAD and CAE: Analysis and Combination of Diverse Current Approaches In: Ekinoviæ: S.

Kreimeyer, M., Herfeld, U., Deubzer, F., Dequidt, C., & Lindemann, U. (2006). Function-driven product design in virtual teams through methodical structuring of requirements and components. Paper presented at the ASME 8th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis.

Lindemann, U., Maurer, M., & Braun, T. (2008). Structural complexity management: an approach for the field of product design: Springer Science & Business Media.

Maier, A. M., Kreimeyer, M., Lindemann, U., & Clarkson, P. J. (2009). Reflecting communication: a key factor for successful collaboration between embodiment design and simulation. Journal of Engineering Design, 20(3), 265-287.

Maurer, M. S. (2007). Structural awareness in complex product design. Universität München.

Park, H.-S., & Dang, X.-P. (2010). Structural optimization based on CAD–CAE integration and metamodeling techniques. Computer-Aided Design, 42(10), 889-902. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2010.06.003

Schumacher, A., Merkel, M., & Hierold, R. (2002). Parametrisierte CAD-Modelle als Basis für eine CAE-gesteuerte Komponentenentwicklung.

Ulrich, S.D., Eppinger, K.T., 2004. Product Design and Development, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 331-335.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-20

How to Cite

Enhancing Collaboration between Design and Simulation Departments by Methods of Complexity Management. (2022). The Journal of Modern Project Management, 4(3). https://journalmodernpm.com/manuscript/index.php/jmpm/article/view/JMPM01208

Similar Articles

1-10 of 466

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)