The Boundary between Good and Bad Multitasking in CCPM

Authors

  • Mahdi Ghaffari University of Manchester - School of MACE United Kingdom
  • Margaret W Emsley University of Manchester United Kingdom

Keywords:

Scheduling, Critical Chain, Multitasking, Multi-Project, Resource Availability, Monte Carlo, Relay Race

Abstract

Elimination of bad multitasking, as one of the main features of Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM), implies that there is also a good level of multitasking that can be retained in such environment. Although there have been attempts to define good and bad multitasking, the boundary between them is not yet lucid in practical terms. The present study intends to clarify this boundary for multi-project environments with ten different rates of resource availability using Monte Carlo simulations of randomly generated project data. The conclusions drawn from results of simulations of ten portfolios with similar size, variability and complexity levels, each containing four projects, show that while no level of multitasking is good for portfolios with resource availability rates of 170% of all resource requirements or higher, for lower rates, a good multitasking of up to two tasks at the same time can be distinguished from multitasking of 3 tasks and more as bad multitasking. This is a significant contribution to the theory of CCPM because of its implications for the roadrunner mentality recommended by CCPM and the fact that for the first time a boundary is suggested for determination of good and bad multitasking in multi-project environments.

Author Biographies

  • Mahdi Ghaffari, University of Manchester - School of MACE United Kingdom

    Mahdi Ghaffari is a PhD candidate at The University of Manchester undertaking his research on resource availability issues in Critical Chain Multi-Project Management and their effects on sizes of buffers in such environments. He has achieved a Bachelors degree (BSc) in Industrial Engineering and Master of Science in Management of Projects. His experience includes working as a project manager of maintenance projects for about three years. He is also certified as PRINCE2 Practitioner by OGC based in the UK and PMP by PMI based in the USA.

  • Margaret W Emsley, University of Manchester United Kingdom

    Dr. Margaret Emsley is a civil and structural engineer who joined what was then UMIST in 1986, and she is now a Reader in the School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering in The University of Manchester. Previously she had carried out research at Loughborough University and worked as an engineer for Tarmac Construction. She was involved in setting up the MSc in Construction Project Management in 1987 and has contributed to the teaching of many courses at both undergraduate and postgraduate level. She has supervised 13 PhD students and over 150 MSc students and has 7 current PhD students. She is currently the Programme Director of the MSc Management of Projects Group of Programmes (which also includes Commercial Project Management, Construction Project Management and Engineering Project Management).

References

Buser, T. and Peter, N. (2012). Multitasking. Experimental Economics. 15 (4). 641- 55.

Charron S, Koechlin E. (2010). Divided representation of concurrent goals in the human frontal lobes. Science. 328 (360). 360-36.

Clarke, K. B. and Wheelwright, S. C. (1993). Managing New Product and Process Development: Text and Cases. New York: The Free Press.

Coviello, D., Ichino, A. and Persico, N. (2010). Don't spread yourself too thin: The impact of task juggling on workers' speed of job completion. National Bureau of Economic Research. Available from: http://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/45978/1/663153808.pdf [Accessed on 9 March 2016].

Cox, J. F., Boyd, L. H., Sullivan, T. T., Reid, R. A. and Cartie, B. (2012). The TOCICO Dictionary. [online].

Available From:

http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.tocico.org/resource/resmgr/dictionary/tocico_dictionary_2nd_ editio.pdf [Accessed on 23 January 2016].

Demeulemeester, E., Vanhoucke, M. and Herroelen, W. (2003). RANGEN- A Random Network Generator for Activity-On-the-Node Networks. Journal of Scheduling. 6. 17-38.

Edwards, M. B. and Gronlund, S. D. (1998). Task Interruption and its Effects on Memory. Memory. 6 (6). 665-87.

Elfving, J. A. and Tommelein, I. D. (2003). Impact of Multitasking and Merge Bias on Procurement of Complex Equipment. In: The 2003 Winter Simulation Conference. 7-10 December. New Orleans, LA.

Foerede, K., Knowlton, B. J. and Poldrack, R. A. (2006). Modulation of Competing Memory Systems by Distraction. Proceedings of the National Academic of Sciences of the united States of America. 103 (31). 11778-83.

Ghaffari, M. and Emsley, M. W. (2015). Current Status and Future Potential of the Research on Critical Chain Project Management. Surveys in Operations Research and Management Science. 20. 43-54.

Gladstones, W. H.; Regan, M. A.; Lee, R. B. (1989). Division of attention: The single-channel hypothesis revisited. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology.41. 1–17.

Goldratt, E. M. (1997). Critical Chain. New York: North River Press.

Goldratt UK. (2007). How bad is bad? [online]. Available From: http://www.goldratt.co.uk/articles/pm/badmulti.html [Accessed on 6 April 2016].

Gorlick, A. (2009). Media Multitaskers pay mental price. [online]. Available From:

http://news.stanford.edu/news/2009/august24/multitask-research-study-082409.html

[Accessed on 9 March 2016].

Herman, M. and Goldratt, R. (2010). Less is More. In: Cox, J. F. and Schleier, J. G. eds. Theory of Constraints Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill. pp. 587-601.

Herroelen, W. and Leus, R. (2001). On the merits and pitfalls of critical chain scheduling. Journal of Operations Management. 19, 559-577.

Kendall, G. I. and Austin, K. M. (2013). Multi-Project Management. Plantation, FL: J. Ross Publishing Inc.

Kerzner, H. R. (2006). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. 9th ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

Leach, L. P. (1999). Critical Chain Project Management Improves Project Performance. Project Management Journal. 30(2). 39-51.

Leach, L. P. (2000). Critical Chain Project Management. 2nd ed. Boston: Artech House.

Leach, L. P. (2003). Schedule and Cost Buffer Sizing: How to Account for the Bias Between Project Performance and Your Model. Project Management Journal. 34(2). 34-47.

Leach, L. P. (2014). Critical Chain Project Management. 3rd ed. Boston: Artech House.

Lechler, T. G., Ronen, B. and Stohr, E. A. (2005). Critical Chain: A New Project Management Paradigm or Old Wine in New Bottles? Engineering Management Journal. 17, 45-58.

Levine, R. I. (1984). Statistics For Management. 3 ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.

Matthews, B. and Ross, L. (2010). Research Methods: A Practical Guide ofr the Social Researchers. London: Pearson Education Limited.

McCollum, J. K. and Sherman, J. D. (1991). Technical Management Notes. IEEE Transactions On Engineering Management. 38 (1). 75-78.

Newbold, R. C. (1998). Project Management in The Fast Lane: applying the Theory of Constraints. London: St. Lucie Press.

Palmer, G. (2013). The Real Reason That Projects Fail and How to Fix it. [Online]. Available From: http://www.slideshare.net/assocpm/critical-chain-project-management-gary-pa [Accessed on 6 April 2016].

Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin.116 (2). 220–244.

Pinto, J. K. and Covin, J. G. (1989). Critical factors in project implementation: A comparison study of construction and R&D projects. Technovation. 9(1). 49-51.

Raz, T., Barnes, R. and Dvir, D. (2003). A Critical Look at Critical Chain Project Management. Project Management Journal. 34, 24-32.

Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2009). Research Methods for Business Students. 5th ed. London: Pearson Education Limited.

Shenhar, A. J. and Dvir, D. (1996). Toward a typological theory of project management. Research policy. 25 (4). 607-632.

Shenhar, A. J., Tishler, A., Dvir, D., Lipovetsky, S. and Lechler, T. (2002). Refining the search for project success factors- a multivariate, typological approach. “R&D Management”, 32 (2), 111-26.

Shurrab, M. (2015). Traditional Critical Path Method versus Critical Chain Project Management: A Comparative View. International Journal of Economics & Management Sciences. 4. 292.

Sproull, B. (2015). The Wasteful art of bad multitasking. [Online]. Available From: http://manufacturing.ecisolutions.com/blog/posts/2015/december/the-wasteful-art-of-bad-multitasking.aspx?r=1 [Accessed on 6 April 2016].

Steyn, H. (2001). An investigation into the fundamentals of critical chain project scheduling. International Journal of Project Management. 19, 363-369.

Steyn, H. (2002). Project management applications of the theory of constraints beyond critical chain scheduling. International Journal of Project Management. 20, 75-80.

Trietsch, D. (2005). Why A Critical Path by Any Other Name Would Smell Less Sweet? Project Management Journal. 36, 27-36.

Wheelwright, S.C. and Clark, K.B. (1992). Revolutionizing Product Development. New York: The Free Press.

Whoeppel, M. (2009). Critical Chain Project Management Reduces Project Lead Time. [Online]. Available From: https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/critical-chain-project-management-reduces-project-lead-time.php [Accessed on 6 April 2016].

Youker, R. (1999). The difference between different types of projects. In: Project Management Institute, Proceedings of the 30th Annual Project Management Institute Seminars & Symposium, October 10-16, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-20

How to Cite

The Boundary between Good and Bad Multitasking in CCPM. (2022). The Journal of Modern Project Management, 4(1), 178. https://journalmodernpm.com/manuscript/index.php/jmpm/article/view/222

Similar Articles

121-130 of 421

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.