Effective Corrective Action: The initial/envelope model for managing projects

Authors

  • John Nevison New Leaf Project Management United States
  • Karim J. Chichakly Worcester Polytechnic Institute United States

Keywords:

White-collar project, earned value, earned-value metrics, Cost Performance Index, CPI, Remaining Work Index, RWI, Staffing to Schedule Index, StSI, Reduced Scope Index, RScI, scope creep, envelope project, schedule management, staffing management, rookie-

Abstract

Summary Two of the most important dynamics in planning for projects are the “rookie-professional” up-to-speed delay for new hires, and the “undiscovered-rework” feedback loop. A recent report [Nevison, 2015] used a project model that did not include the undiscovered-rework loop. This report addresses that shortcoming by using a different project model that explicitly includes both the undiscovered-rework feedback loop and the rookie-professional up-to-speed delay. First, the initial system-dynamic model’s project plan gets modified to run with a realistic set of fine-tuned parameters and to produce a “best-case” project plan of acceptable scope, schedule, and cost. Then the best-case model’s “actual-to-date” staffing pattern becomes the “planned-value-to-date” staffing histogram for an “envelope” earned-value model. The envelope model sets its parameters to the best-case model and then uses system pressures derived from earned-value metrics to “work the plan” two ways: When everything goes according to plan, the envelope model correctly maintains the planned staff and scope to complete the project on time. When extra, unforeseen work is needed, the envelope model detects the need for additional staff or reduced scope and correctly adjusts the project to complete the project on time. Conclusion: The “envelope” model’s earned-value metrics prove completely adequate to manage the project successfully.

Author Biographies

  • John Nevison, New Leaf Project Management United States

    John M. (Jack) Nevison, [A1] PMP, President of New Leaf Project Management, is the author of six books and numerous articles on computing and management. His first simulation model was published in 1974. During the course of his business career, Nevison has built and sold two businesses, managed projects, managed project managers, and served as both an internal and external consultant to Fortune 100 companies. He is a past president of the Mass Bay Chapter of the Project Management Institute (PMI®) and a past president of the Greater Boston Chapter of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). For more information see the website at www.newleafpm.com, or contact Nevison at info@newleafpm.com or 978-369-9009.

  • Karim J. Chichakly, Worcester Polytechnic Institute United States

    Karim J. Chichakly, PhD, Co-President of isee systems, inc. and Adjunct Professor of System Dynamics at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, has over two decades experience on modeling projects in business strategy, project management, health care, public policy, and the environment. Karim developed the draft XMILE standard for interchanging and archiving System Dynamics models, which was recently approved as an OASIS standard.

References

Abdel-Hamid, Tarek K. (December 1989) “Lessons Learned from Modeling the Dynamics of Software Development.” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 32, No. 12: pp. 1426-1438

Chichakly, K. (2007). “Modeling Agile Development: When Is It Effective?” Proc Int’l Conf. of the System Dynamics Society 2007.

Christensen, David S., & Kirk Payne (April 1992) “Cost Performance Index Stability: Fact or Fiction?” Journal of Parametrics 10.

Christensen, David S. (1993) “Determining an Accurate Estimate at Completion.” National Contract Management Journal 25.

Christensen, David S. (Summer 1999) “Using the Earned Value Cost Management Report to Evaluate the Contractor’s Estimate at Completion.” Acquisition Review Quarterly.

Cooper, Kenneth G. (March 1993) The Rework Cycle: Benchmarks for the Project Manager. Project Management Journal, Volume XXIV, No. 1: pp. 17-21.

Cooper, Kenneth G. (March 1994) “The $2,000 Hour: How Managers Influence Project Performance Through the Rework Cycle.” Project Management Journal, Volume XXV, No. 1: pp. 11-24.

Fleming, Quentin W. and Joel M. Koppelman (2010). Earned Value Project Management, Fourth Edition. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute (PMI).

Nevison, John M. (March 1992) White Collar Project Management Questionnaire Report. Internal Working Paper. Concord, MA: New Leaf Project Management.

Nevison, John M. (June 1994) “Up To Speed: The Cost of Learning on a White-Collar Project.” Project Management Journal, Volume XXV, No. 2: pp. 11-15.

Nevison, John M. (June 1994) “What Can we Learn About Learning on Projects?” PMNETwork: pp. 6-8.

Nevison, John M. (June 2003) The Remaining Work Index (RWI) and the Staffing to Schedule Index (StSI). Internal Working Paper. Concord, MA: New Leaf Project Management.

Nevison, John M. (June 2013) StSI and RbSI Compared. Internal Working Paper. Concord, MA: New Leaf Project Management.

Nevison, John M. (December 2014) The Reduced Scope Index (RScI): How to estimate your adjusted scope as you finish your project on time and on budget. Internal Working Paper. Concord, MA: New Leaf Project Management.

Nevison, John M. (2015) “Working the ‘Educated’ Plan: How effective is corrective staffing in a typical white-collar project?” Journal of Modern Project Management, JMPM journal, – www.journalmodernpm.com Issue 06 – Jan-May/2015

Powell, F. D. (1987) Study of a Software Development Process Dynamic Model. Bedford, MA: Mitre Corporation. MTR 10314.

Roberts, E. B. (1964) The Dynamics of Research and Development. New York, NY: Harper and Row

Downloads

Published

2022-05-20

How to Cite

Effective Corrective Action: The initial/envelope model for managing projects. (2022). The Journal of Modern Project Management, 4(3). https://journalmodernpm.com/manuscript/index.php/jmpm/article/view/256

Similar Articles

1-10 of 452

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.