Agile Enhancement of Critical PMBoK v6 Processes

Authors

  • Philipp Rosenberer University of Applied Science FH Campus Wien Austria
  • József Tick Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary Hungary

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19255/JMPM02613

Keywords:

PMBOK, IT Project Management, Agile, Project Management Framework, Tailoring, SCRUM

Abstract

This article examines PMBOK version six applicability in agile IT projects. Based on existing scientific research about troubling compatibility of PMBOK processes and agile frameworks, enhancements of five critical project processes are postulated. These process enhancements often focus on time-limited disruptions of agile actions and a separation of macro- and micro-management between agile developments and project management practices. To verify the effectiveness of such enhancement approaches, a quantitative survey explores the applicability and current state of usage. Results show that most proposed solutions are currently not widely used in IT project management although practitioners have evaluated them as useful. However, participants tend to increase the use when understanding more about the solutions. In combination with the discovered positive rating of the effectiveness of enhancement approaches, it can be summarized that the improvement approaches are a well-perceived step towards the enhancement of PMBOK processes in agile developed IT projects.

Author Biographies

  • Philipp Rosenberer, University of Applied Science FH Campus Wien Austria

    FH-Professor at University of Applied Science FH Campus Wien at master program Technical Management

  • József Tick, Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary Hungary

    Associated professor in the Institute of Software Design and Development, at the John von Neumann Faculty of Informatics of Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary.

References

AgileManifesto (2001) Manifesto for Agile Software Development. https://agilemanifesto.org/

Axelos (2017) Prince 2 Handbook. Axelos Global Best Practice, TSO The Stationary Office

Blaxter, L.; Hughes. C.; Tight, M.; (1996) How to Research. Open University Press

Dziuban, C.; Shirkey, E.; (1974) When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. Psychological Bulletin, 358 - 361

Field, A.; (2017) Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS. Sage Publications Ltd.

Iarossi, G.; (2006) The Power of Survey Design: A User's Guide for Managing Surveys. Interpreting Results, and Influencing Respondents. The World Bank

Lewthwaite, J.; (2006) Managing People for the First Time: Gaining Commitment and Improving Performance. Thorogood Publishing

Pichler, R.; (2007) Agiles Projektmanagement erfolgreich einsetzen. dpunkt.verlag

PMI (2017) A Guide To The Project Management Body Of Knowledge (PMBOK-Guide) – Sixth version. Project Management Institute

Rosenberger, P.; Tick, J.; (2018) Suitability of PMBOK 6th edition for agile-developed IT Projects. CINTI 2018 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Informatics, 241-247, https://doi.org/10.1109/CINTI45972.2018

Rouse, M.; (2013). Agile velocity. http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/Agile-velocity

Scott-Young, C.; Samson, D.; (2008) Project success and project team management: evidence from capital projects in the process industries. J. Oper. Manag. 749–766

Sharma, S.; (2017) The DevOps Adoption Playbook. A Guide to Adopting DevOps in a Multi-Speed IT Enterprise. Wiley

The Project Group (2019) TPG Phase Method. https://www.theprojectgroup.com/en/services/project-management-consulting/ms-project-implementation.html

Wendt, R.; (2016) Hybrides Projektmanagement für agile Projekte in mittelständischen und großen Unternehmen. http://www.masventa.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/media/pdf_de/PMI/PMI-SG-Live_2016-12__1_.pdf

Downloads

Published

2022-05-20

How to Cite

Agile Enhancement of Critical PMBoK v6 Processes. (2022). The Journal of Modern Project Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.19255/JMPM02613

Similar Articles

1-10 of 454

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.