Investigation of the institutionalizing responsibility of project managers for project benefits realization
Keywords:
Benefits realization, Institutionalization, project managers responsibilityAbstract
The purpose of projects is to produce benefits, but who is responsible for project benefits realization? Project management practitioner-guiding frameworks are clear on the responsibility for benefits realization. The majority of scientific papers on the topic follows the same logic. However, watercooler conversations with practitioners reveal a more nuanced project reality. The purpose of the paper is to investigate the gap between theory and practice. Given an opportunity for collaboration with a large-scale Danish survey among practitioners of project management we included clarification of the institutionalization of responsibility for project benefits realization. The investigation was conducted with institutional logic as a lens, and the contribution of this paper is a deeper understanding of the stakeholder diversity regarding responsibility for benefits realization and to the socio-political dimension of the complexity of project management. The findings from the survey demonstrate that one in three of the participants holds the project manager responsible for benefits realization – in contrast to the overall recommendations in guidelines and research literature. The value of the paper is the demonstration inconsistence and hereby assist the understanding of the complexity and diversity of responsibility of benefits realization.
References
Ashurst, C. (2011). Benefits Realization from Information Technology: Palgrave Macmillan.
Badewi, A. (2016). The impact of project management (PM) and benefits management (BM) practices on project success: Towards developing a project benefits governance framework. International Journal of Project Management, 34(4), 761-778.
Badewi, A., & Shehab, E. (2016). The impact of organizational project benefits management governance on ERP project success: Neo-institutional theory perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 34(3), 412-428.
Bradley, B. (2010). Benefit Realisation Management: A Practical Guide to Achieving Benefits Through Change (2 ed.). Surrey, England: Gower Publishing Limited.
Cicmil, S., Williams, T., Thomas, J., & Hodgson, D. (2006). Rethinking project management: researching the actuality of projects. International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 675-686.
Cooke-Davies, T. (2002). The “real” success factors on projects. International Journal of Project Management, 20(3), 185-190. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00067-9
Dalcher, D. (2016). Rethinking project practice: emerging insights from a series of books for practitioners. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 9(4), 798-821. doi:10.1108/IJMPB-03-2016-0027
Davis, K. (2017). An empirical investigation into different stakeholder groups perception of project success. International Journal of Project Management, 35(4), 604-617.
Einhorn, F., & Marnewick, C. (2018). Facilitators for the effective use of the business case for IT projects. Paper presented at the EURAM 2018, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Einhorn, F., Marnewick, C., & Meredith, J. (2019). Achieving strategic benefits from business IT projects: The critical importance of using the business case across the entire project lifetime. International Journal of Project Management, 37(8), 989-1002. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.09.001
Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions.
Hofstede, G. (1984). Cultural dimensions in management and planning. Asia Pacific journal of management, 1(2), 81-99.
International Project Management Association. (2015). Individual competence baseline for project, programme & portfolio management. In (pp. 416). Zurich, Switserland: International Project Management Association.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow: Macmillan.
Laursen, M., & Svejvig, P. (2016). Taking stock of project value creation: A structured literature review with future directions for research and practice. International Journal of Project Management, 34(4), 736-747. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.06.007
Marnewick, C. (2014). The business case: The missing link between information technology benefits and organisational strategies. Acta Commercii, 14(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.4102/ac.v14i1.208
McGrath, S. K., & Whitty, S. J. (2019). A typology of meanings: Practitioners views of ‘program’. The Journal of Modern Project Management, 7(2).
McLeod, L., Doolin, B., & MacDonell, S. G. (2012). A Perspective-Based Understanding of Project Success. Project Management Journal, 43(5), 68-86. doi:10.1002/pmj.21290
Mikkelsen, M. (2018). Projects, success, and complexity. International Project Management Association Research Conference 2017, UTS ePRESS, Sydney:. In.
Musawir, A. u., Serra, C. E. M., Zwikael, O., & Ali, I. (2017). Project governance, benefit management, and project success: Towards a framework for supporting organizational strategy implementation.
International Journal of Project Management, 35(8), 1658-1672. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.07.007
Ocasio, W., Thornton, P. H., & Lounsbury, M. (2017). The Institutional Logics Perspective. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. E.
Meyer (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (2 ed.). London, United Kingdom: SAGE Publications Ltd
Office of Government Commerce. (2009). Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2 (5 ed.). United Kingdom: The Stationary Office.
Peppard, J., Ward, J., & Daniel, E. (2007). Managing the realization of business benefits from IT investments. MIS Quarterly Executive, 6(1), 1-11. Retrieved from http://0-search.ebscohost.com.ujlink.uj.ac.za/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bsu&AN=24910900&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Project Management Institute. (2013). The Standard for Program Management (3 ed.). Newtown Square, Pennsylvania: USA: Project Management Institute.
Project Management Institute. (2016). Establishing Benefits Ownership and Accountability. Retrieved from Newtown, Pennsylvania: USA: http://www.pmi.org/learning/thought-leadership/series/benefits-realization/establishing-benefits-realization-ownership-accountability
Project Management Institute. (2017a). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (6 ed.). Newtown Square, Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute.
Project Management Institute. (2017b). The Standard for Program Management (4 ed.). Newtown Square, Pennsylvania: USA: Project Management Institute.
Project Management Institute, P. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)— Sixth Edition (Vol. ).
Scott, W. R. (2005). Institutional theory: Contributing to a theoretical research program. In K. G. Smith & M. A. Hitt (Eds.), Great minds in management: The process of theory development. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Serra, C. E. M., & Kunc, M. (2015). Benefits realisation management and its influence on project success and on the execution of business strategies. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 53-66.
Sowden, R. (2011). Managing Successful Programmes. London, United Kingdom: The Stationery Office.
Svejvig, P., & Andersen, P. (2015). Rethinking project management: A structured literature review with a critical look at the brave new world. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 278-290.
Svejvig, P., Geraldi, J., & Grex, S. (2019). Accelerating time to impact: Deconstructing practices to achieve project value. International Journal of Project Management, 37(5), 784-801.
Svejvig, P., Geraldi, J., & Grex, S. (2019). Accelerating time to impact: Deconstructing practices to achieve project value. International Journal of Project Management.
Svejvig, P., & Grex, S. (2016). The Danish agenda for rethinking project management. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 9(4), 822-844.
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Trokić, A. (2016). Entrepreneurial Project Management–Cross-Fertilization between the Fields.
Ward, J., & Daniel, E. (2012). Benefits Management: How to Increase the Business Value of Your IT Projects (2 ed.). United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons.
Zwikael, O., & Meredith, J. R. (2018). Who’s who in the project zoo? The ten core project roles. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(2), 474-492. doi:10.1108/IJOPM-05-2017-0274
Zwikael, O., Meredith, J. R., & Smyrk, J. (2019). The responsibilities of the project owner in benefits realization. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 39(4), 503-524. doi:doi:10.1108/IJOPM-02-2018-0086
Zwikael, O., & Smyrk, J. (2015). Project governance: Balancing control and trust in dealing with risk. International Journal of Project Management, 33(4), 852-862. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.10.012
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Mogens Frank Mikkelsen, Carl Marnewick
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
