Deficiencies in and Alternatives to Heat Map Risk Matrices for Project Risk Prioritization

Authors

  • Jamie Peter Monat Professor of Practice Worcester Polytechnic Institute United States
  • Scott Doremus Worcester Polytechnic Institute United States

Keywords:

Risk Management, Heat Maps, Matrices

Abstract

Heat map risk matrices are widely used to prioritize risks. They are Standard Operating Tools for risk management as prescribed by the Project Management Institute (PMI), International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE), and many other organizations. They are widely used in projects and programs structured for product development, business, construction, R & D, medicine, and politics. However, they suffer from several weaknesses, notably subjectivity, symmetry, category prioritization reversal, and a failure to account for Risk Aversion, which often dominates how individuals and companies feel about risk. Because of this, they can lead to serious mis-prioritization and mismanagement of risks. We propose an alternative to the standard risk matrix that accounts for these deficiencies and provides a significantly better risk prioritization tool. Two field trials were conducted to demonstrate the benefits of the alternative method for project managers.

Author Biography

  • Scott Doremus, Worcester Polytechnic Institute United States

    Senior Lecturer for the Electrical and Comuter Engineering Department. Affiliate Professor for the Foisie Schools of Business and Computer Science.

References

Alleman, G. (2010). Herding Cats, Retrieved from http://herdingcats.typepad.com/my_weblog/2010/07/risk-matrix.html

Aven, Terje, “Improving Risk Characterisations in Practical Situations by Highlighting Knowledge Aspects, with Applications to Risk Matrices,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety 167, 2017, 42-48

Bahill, A. Terry, and Smith, Eric D. (2009), “An Industry Standard Risk Analysis Technique,” Engineering Management Journal, 21:4, 16-29

Ball, David J., and J. Watt, “Further Thoughts on the Utility of Risk Matrices,” Risk Analysis 33 (11), 2013, 2068-2078

Binswanger, H. P. (1981). Attitudes Towards Risk: Theoretical Implications of an Experiment in Rural India. The Economic Journal, 91(364).

Clemen and Reilly, Making Hard Decisions with DecisionTools®, 3rd Ed., 2014, South-Western Cengage Learning, 640-659

Cox, L. A. Jr. (2008). What’s Wrong with Risk Matrices? Risk Analysis, 28(2), 497.

Cox, L. A. Jr., as quoted in Hubbard, Douglas W., The Failure of Risk Management, 2009, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, p. 123

Davies, Martin, Making a Risk Matrix Useful, http://causalcapital.blogspot.com/2015/08/making-risk-matrix-useful.html, 2015

Department of Defense, “Risk Management Guide for DoD Acquisition, Sixth Edition (Version 1.0),” 2006, p. 11

Duijm, Nijs Jan, “Recommendations On the Use and Design of Risk Matrices,” Safety Science, 76, 2015, pp. 21-31

Howard, Ronald A., 1988, “Decision Analysis: Practice and Promise,” Management Science 34 (6), 679

Hubbard, Douglas W., The Failure of Risk Management, 2009, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 122-125

INCOSE, Systems Engineering Handbook (2011), INCOSE‐TP‐2003‐002‐03.2.2, Wiley

INCOSE, Systems Engineering Handbook (2015), INCOSE‐TP‐2003‐002‐04, Wiley, p. 117

McNamee, P., and Celona, J., (1987). Decision Analysis for the Professional with Supertree, Redwood City, CA: Scientific Press.

Microsoft (2017), “Risk Management Process Overview,” https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc535304.aspx

Monat, J. P., “Enhanced Risk Assessment Matrix for the Management of Project Risks,” Project Management Institute Virtual Library, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.400.1616&rep=rep1&type=pdf, February 2013

Oboni, Franco, and Oboni, Cesar, (2013), “What You Need to Know About Risk Management Methods,” Riskope International, Vancouver, BC, Canada, www.riskope.com

Pickering, Alexander, and Cowley, Stephen P. (2010), “Risk Matrices: Implied Accuracy and False Assumptions,” J. of Health and Safety Research and Practice, 2 (1), 9-16

Pratt, J.W., (1964). Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large. Econometrica, 32. 122–136.

Project Management Institute (2008). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® guide)—Fourth edition. Newtown Square, PA

Systems Engineering Process Office, 212, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, “Risk Management Process,” PR-SPP-04 v3.0, 10 June 2002

Taylor, J., & Weerapana, A. (2010). Principles of Macroeconomics: Global Financial Crisis eEdition. (406–408). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.

Thomas, Philip, Bratvold, Reidar, and Bickel, J. Eric (2014), “The Risk of Using Risk Matrices,” SPE Economics and Management 6 (2), 56-66

University of Sydney, WHS Risk Management Steps, http://sydney.edu.au/whs/activities/prioritise.shtml, 2016

Wall, Kent D., “The Trouble with Risk Matrices,” (2011), Naval Postgraduate School (DRMI) Working Paper

Wijnia, Ype (2012), “Asset Risk Management: Issues in the Design and Use of the Risk Matrix,” In: Mathew J., Ma L., Tan A., Weijnen M., Lee J. (Eds.) Engineering Asset Management and Infrastructure Sustainability, Springer, London, 1043-1059

Downloads

Published

2022-05-20

How to Cite

Deficiencies in and Alternatives to Heat Map Risk Matrices for Project Risk Prioritization. (2022). The Journal of Modern Project Management, 6(1). https://journalmodernpm.com/manuscript/index.php/jmpm/article/view/JMPM01612

Similar Articles

1-10 of 437

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.